“WE SHOULD END
PLASTIC BAGS IN OUR CITIES BEFORE WE FACE CALAMITIES’”
In almost every
part of the world have taken environmental concern against plastic bags with
the view on the relationship between environment, sustainable development and
human survival. The concern also has been sided with the assumption that
sustainable development cannot be attained without taking consideration of environment.
Environment need to be conserved, protected, and developed for future
generation and sustainability of human species.
Plastic bags for
that logic has now taken the lead in polluters race, a large part of the world
has been affected by plastic and polyethene
materials, people face calamities like flood, soil degradation and lose soil
fertility, increasing litters due to
plastic and polythene materials. Tanzania like any other countries of the world
is going through these problems with its cities especially major cities of Dar
es Salaam, Mbeya, Arusha, Tanga, Mwanza and others being clouded by plastic
bags. Plastic bags and plastic bottles has become the alternative for
commercial and domestic use in those major cities of Tanzania. In almost every
corner of these cities are colored by these materials. Citizens in Tanzania has
opted for the plastic bags for their domestic use like market shopping, and
small commodities caring, they have even turned these bags as their travel
bags, pupils and students use the plastic bags as their school bags. Dar es Salaam
in particular they have assigned the name “take away” as the name to legalize
the use of plastic bags and plastic bottles. In Kariakoo market a famous market
in Dar es Salaam street vendors has climaxed the business of plastic bags. And
this has been similar to other market where street vendors sell plastic bags to
customers coming for shopping and retailers to pack their product for sales. Traders and industries have utilized the
legalization of plastic bags from citizens by trying to make their product pack
in plastic containers, for example beverages traders and industries currently
have manufactured plastic bottles in order to cover the market.
But in case of Dar
es salaam plastic bottles are now in
control as many youth collect them from streets and users, for recycling
by specific industries, the question is amounting on plastic bags especially
those of 30s and below 30 microns.
IMPACT OF PLASTIC BAGS AND POLYETHYLEN
MATERIALS TO ENVIRONMENT IN TANZANIA
Plastic bags
cause a lot of damages to our environment and human development. Plastic bags
are made from petroleum and other natural resources that even if you decide to
recycle them you will probably face air pollution as they emit smoke containing
toxic gas which is harmful to atmospheric bacteria. Therefore it is necessary
to ban the production, distribution and use of plastic bags without considering
the nature and the size of those bags because all plastic and polyethene
material share effects and there hazardous to environment.
Some people has pointed
out some reasonable and sounding effect caused by plastic bags as they have experienced them,
most of them point out the pollution to the environment outlook and the soil
suitability for agriculture. Ludovic Kazoka (DailyNews 16, august 2013) in his
article “Tanzania state impose fresh ban
on plastic bags” stated that plastic bags are harmful and cause soil degradation,
through burning of wastes, harmful emission of toxic and endangering of human
and animal lives. Other observers like Larry West (about.com 2013) the article
“why stop using plastic bags” he said
plastic bags clog water ways, spoil landscape and end up landfill.
But also Dr
Terezy Huviza (minister responsible ) in press conference argued that the prevalence’s
of plastic bags was endangering the lives of creature on land and water bodies,
she added plastic bags damaging soil
hence posing a serious challenges to agricultural activities and the burning of
them was causing air pollution.
To argue on the
effect of these bags, then the plastic bags affect environment in almost all angles
that is in water bodies, soil, wildlife and totality to human lives. Taking
focus on land, plastic bags are not easily to decompose it is estimated that it
take about 1000 years to decompose in soil. These situation cause soil
degradation and sometime loose water penetration to soil, which in turn confuse
agricultural activities. So by taking such stand we found causality sense of
plastic bags and agricultural decline. Plastic
bags are very really to decompose then cause degradation which led to
agricultural decline and eventually cause the loss of food to human species and
microorganism.
But also the
situation hinder economic development as the soil became unproductive due to
lose of soil fertility. Then those who depend on agriculture for economic
growth decline economically due to their productive limit by prevalence of
plastic bags in soil. For the country like Tanzania whereby two third of the
population depend on agriculture for their economic growth, therefore require
land fertility. And when that fertility is not maintains then their economy
survival will probably decline. With this stance then it is real that the
effects of plastic bags are not only on observable effect but it cause other
impact to lives of people and country.
Plastic bags
also may complicate the economy as they require barrels of petroleum and other
natural resources for manufacturing. It has been argued that about 60-100
million barrels of petroleum are need to every year around the world to make
plastic bags (Rita 2011). Developing country may experience the economic slow
down through the rise of petroleum price in ordinary market, therefore even
transportation of their products to the industry and to consumers became under
complications.
The prevalence
of plastic bags in streets and with human surrounding increase the litters in
those areas. Plastic bags are easily loses its quality of use therefore there
thrown away after either single use or double use. And the plastic bags have
increased its use in Tanzania and other country. Customers and retailers use
plastic bags especially those of 35 microns as there offered free and durable,
easy to carry. For example chips makers currently has made plastic bags as
their containers, those local and domestic market use these plastic bags as
important containers. This increased the amount of litters in street and in our
surroundings. Rita (2011) put in short that each year more and more bags are
ending up littering the environment, once they became litters plastic bags find
their ways into our waterways, parks, beaches, trenches and street. And if they
are banned they infuse the air with toxic fume.
From environmental view these litters are polluter to human environment,
and in another way increase the budget of waste collections to municipal
authority and central government as well.
In another way
plastic bags when there are not banned and managed in proper way they can block
drainage system and cause flooding as well as street smell. When these bags are
logged into tributaries and trenches in town block water pass for a long time,
things that led trenches and tributaries to flood and disturbance to people. A
good example is India where these bags caused flood due to system blockage by
plastic bags. But other evidence is in our city (Dar es Salaam) where almost
all the trenches along load and street are logged by the plastic bags.
They also kill
animals and water related animals, plastic bags kill animals when they mistake
them with food. Animals like cattle, goats, sheep, and wildlife animals eat
glasses with increase of plastic bags litters may cause these animals to
mistake and eat plastic bags litters. In
water bodies plastic bags take a long time to decompose and complicate the food
for aquatic animals, as they cause toxic poison when thrown into water bodies.
INITIATIVE TO CONTROL IN TANZANIA AND OTHER
COUNTRY.
Following the
reason that plastic bags a threat to environment every country is trying its
position to ban them from use, production, distribution and availability in
their surroundings. Several countries throughout the world have imposed
legislation and regulations that ban the plastic bags. To have look on the
following countries South Africa in 2003
banned the use of high density polyethylene (HDPE) plastic bags (less than
30microns), they also imposed a levy on the thicker plastic bags the government
laws required retailers to sell plastic bags not to distribute them for
free. Eritrea, Rwanda and Somalia
(Somali land) banned them since 2005, Australia enacted a policy and campaign
with the name “zero waste policy” in 2009 the policy imposed fine to retailers
if they sell or give away plastic bags made from polyethylene polymer (less than
35 micrometer). The government of Australia also provided facilities for collecting
plastic bags in almost all supermarkets within the country.
Other countries
are China in 2008 the country banned the production, distribution, and use of
HDPE, and retailers were allowed to charge customer for the LDPE (0.025
microns). Hong Kongo implemented education campaign called “No Plastic Bags
Please!” And prohibited the retailer to
provide the plastic bags for free. Newzealand in 2009 the government imposed
levy to retailers plastic bags. Denmark 1994 established a tax on plastic and
paper bags paid by retailers. To mention but a few. Data from Marrrickvilla council in support of internet source
Tanzania has
concern has adopted several measures on generally the country enacted a law regarding
environmental safety in 2004, that is the Tanzania Environmental Management Act
2004, the act generalized the issues but not specific to plastic bags. In 2006
the government banned the production, importation, distribution and the use of
the plastic bags below 30 microns in the country. And currently the country has
imposed the fresh ban of plastic bags. The fresh ban as come following the East
African Community (EAC) Polyethylene Material Control Bill 2011 which was
passed by EAC legislative assembly. Tanzania Island namely Pemba has shown a
successful move in a war against plastic bags. In 1996 the revolutionary government
of Zanzibar passed the Environmental Management for Sustainability Development
Acts No 2 of 1996, which prohibited businessmen from manufacturing,
distributing, selling, or using all kind of plastic bags.
The move in Pemba
has reported to have support from citizens where resident turned willingly to
traditional bags and other environmental friendly bags. Mr kombo (fishermen in Pemba)
was quoted by DailyNews journalist saying that almost all resident in the big
town of Chakechake, Mkoani and Wete in Pemba are aware with the negative impact
of plastic bags.
The government
(Pemba) also in its move to fight the plastic bags has involved the following
mechanism including all stakeholders, launching awareness’ campaigns, and other
of alike. Issa Yusufu (journalist-DailyNews) in his article wrote “ the anti-plastic bags task force included
town council authorities, police forces, and community leaders………” in Pemba
also awareness campaign were done through media, public gathering, and use of
sign board in most important stations like bus stations, airports, market
place, round about. All these initiatives helped Pemba to attain a greatest
success in fighting a plastic bag and currently Pemba is a free plastic bags Island
in Zanzibar.
LEVELS OF SUCCESS IN SOME COUNTRIES AND
TANZANIA.
Some countries
within EAC and outside the region have shown a level of success. Within east
Africa community Rwanda is a good
example, the government of Rwanda has succeeded for about 100% on ban plastic
bags. The country has introduced a paper bags which replaced plastic bags.
Rwanda since 2008 had imposed a radical policy against plastic bags and all non
biodegradable materials in Rwanda. Juliet (down town researcher) said anyone
entering Rwanda is ordered to give up their plastic bags or have it confiscate.
The alternative to the ban was paper bags.
But also in
Tanzania island of Pemba successful story has been narrated, the government has
managed to ban the plastic bags with the serious turn to traditional bags
commonly known as “kikapu” in Swahili terms. At the world level some countries
like Denmark and Italy with other euro zone country has marked the success.
For large part
Tanzania mainland especially big cities a ranging behind with the lot of
plastic bags in street and towns. Some comment has been made that the fail is
mostly attributed with lack of commitment to the war.
WHAT IS MISSING IN TANZANIA
Tanzania has
passed several legislation and statement in regard of generally environmental
care. The measures included the Tanzania Environment Management Act of 2004,
Prohibition of Plastic Bags Regulations 2006, and currently the statement of
the minister regarding the total ban of plastic bags. But with all those
measures the country still ranging behind in plastic bags eradication campaigns,
what is missing in case of Tanzania?
To answer the
question, one needs to concretely scrutinize the observable fact in environment
and the question concern. Some people may point out many questions in regard of
what is missing in Tanzania why are we raging behind on the war. But why other
countries have moved forward? What has been in those countries that are in
successful race? To quote Hon. Ester
Bulaya (MP) while arguing on the environmental budget she said “The
government’s ban on production, importation, distribution and use of plastic bags
lacked government commitment”. The commitment of the government in her view was
on the amount of fund the government allocate to the department concern with
environment and the ability to enforce the laws and policies over issues.
To argue on what
is messing the following fact need to be given central focus these include the
stakeholders involvement, awareness and education campaign, and the role of the government over the
issues.
Starting with
stakeholders involvements that the environmental issues in its view concern
every individual therefore every person is stakeholder in environmental issues.
The Tanzania Environmental Management Act No 2 of 2004 article 6state that
“every person living in Tanzania shall have a stake and a duty to safeguard and
enhance the environment and to inform the relevant authority of any activity
and phenomenon that may affect the environment significantly” therefore the act
itself recorganise the need of every individual within Tanzania to be a part of
environmental concern.
To analyze them
stakeholders to our case include governmental stakeholders that is regional,
district, and division authority, local government authority(s), state
apparatus especially police force, and community –policing sector, mass media
both local and foreign mass media, business men and industrialist, retailers,
customer/consumers, Non Governmental Organizations (NGOs) spiritual
institutions, activist groups, academic
institutions, and all environmental loving organizations. All these stakeholders need to act in
mutuality of vision and mission in order to reach the intended mission.
In Tanzania case
the involvement of stakeholders both by the government and some Non-Governmental
Organization (NGOs) involving in the matter have been marginalized to the
extent that large part of stakeholders has been the recipient of the program
but not participants in the move. The
participation of stakeholders in the struggle seem to be in top down nature and
not in horizontal relationship which is required for eradicating plastic bags
Lack of
awareness and education campaigns, for a large part of the use of these plastic
bags are used by citizens and especially common man in their everyday
activities. Therefore awareness and education campaign on the negative impact
over the plastic bags is needed. It is evidenced that Tanzania island of Pemba
have successes to eradicate plastic bags in Pemba through these awareness
campaigns conducted through media and public gathering. For our case then I
suggest the awareness and education campaigns through mass media, social
networks, load sign boards in important areas like bus stand, in public
transport,. These campaigns will open awareness to public on negative impact of
plastic bags. Also these campaigns should be done through youth group, academic
institutions and social groups of other things.
Absence of
serious levy to users, distributors, manufacturers, and sellers of those
plastic bags. In other countries policy has been developed to impose levy and
serious levy to those users of plastic bags. Therefore the government needs to
be committed against plastic bags. Imposition of strict policy and of course
serious administration of the policy will discourage the production, use and
distribution of plastic bags. To argue in our country today plastic bags are distributed
for free and sometime taken as take away means.
Commitment of
the government, government on this case therefore is supposed to be at the
frontline of struggle. And its interventions include budget interventions, and
enforcement of policy and rules against plastic bags.
CONCLUSION.
In concluding
the debate we need to focus and launch serious campaigns against plastic bags.
The government both the central government and the local governmental need to
feel concern with environmental issues. The issues is not merely environmental
but also humanistic destructives, in some areas plastic bags has caused flood,
broken up water ways, trenches, pollute our water bodies, kill aquatic
organisms , and also destruct environmental outlook. But economically also
plastic bags hinder the sector has we need a lot of non renewable natural
resources for production of those bags.
No comments:
Post a Comment